A knight’s horse-shaped head is easy to recognize, but it offers no clue about that peculiar L-shaped move. That’s a small frustration with learning chess: identifying the pieces and remembering what they do are two separate tasks. I like the idea of giving their shapes a little more responsibility, especially when the alternative is explaining the knight’s movement for the fifth time.
Pinke Gans’s Bauhaus Chess Set, a LEGO Ideas fan concept, takes that possibility as its starting point. According to the designer, the idea emerged during a summer visit to the Bauhaus Museum in Weimar, Germany, where Josef Hartwig’s geometric chess pieces brought LEGO bricks to mind. It’s an appealing connection: a construction system built around basic shapes meets a chess set designed to make those shapes meaningful.
Designer: Pinke Gans
Hartwig designed his Bauhaus chess set in 1923, while working at the school in Weimar. Its abstraction wasn’t simply a matter of removing decorative details. The pieces used their forms to communicate their movement, replacing familiar figures with a geometric vocabulary. A minimalist chess set can still leave you memorizing arbitrary symbols; Hartwig’s approach gives some of those symbols a practical explanation.
The knight is the clearest example. Its stepped shape echoes its L-shaped movement, while the bishop’s diagonal cross relates to its diagonal paths across the board. Pinke Gans’s version carries those recognizable forms into bricks. These are useful memory cues, not a complete substitute for learning the rules. Nobody should expect a small cube to explain every complication of a pawn’s first move or capture.
In the supplied images, the queen provides the most conspicuous departure from all those straight edges. Its rounded top becomes a faceted, layered construction, with individual elements visible around its surface. Nearby, the king has a smaller cube turned relative to its base. Together, they introduce enough variation to interrupt the rows of blocks. The brick-built approximation of a sphere gives the queen a texture of its own.
That translation is more interesting to me than a perfectly smooth replica would be. Historical examples of Hartwig’s set were made in wood, so rebuilding the forms in LEGO changes how their surfaces read. Here, joints and tile seams remain visible. They establish a second, finer grid within the larger chessboard pattern, making the construction legible even where exposed studs don’t dominate the design.
The board itself stays restrained: black and white squares, a dark perimeter, and no elaborate scenery competing with the pieces. From the lower viewing angles, the arrangement resembles a small collection of architectural models. I could see this earning its place on a living room table because the visual interest comes from proportion and repetition, rather than decoration.
There is a potential usability tradeoff, though. If you already recognize conventional chess silhouettes instantly, a geometric set asks you to learn a different identification system before its logic becomes helpful. A blocky king and a rounded queen might be clear once explained, but that doesn’t establish faster recognition during play. The images also can’t tell us how securely the pieces hold together when repeatedly picked up.
The project is presented as a LEGO Ideas proposal, rather than an announced retail set. That distinction deserves to stay attached to the enthusiasm. Fan product ideas that reach 10,000 supporters may be considered for production, but reaching that threshold doesn’t itself put a box on store shelves. This submission shouldn’t be treated as a confirmed release or given an imagined price.
For me, the strongest reason to want it is the opportunity to assemble the shapes before playing with them. Building a knight’s stepped form could make its design rationale more tangible than simply reading an explanation beside a finished piece. You’d still need to learn chess. But spending a little time constructing the thing that represents a move seems like a particularly appropriate introduction to Hartwig’s idea.
