The Detroit Fish

Is Mickey Mouse the new head of Tang Hua motors or is it Goofy? Surely no one else would invest the necessary millions into producing these er… ambitious concepts. An Aston Martin they aren’t, but they are just begging for Xzibit to be pimped out. Possibly this is the market? They do get bonus points for being environmentally friendly though, and have the added functionality of being amphibious. This is great, because if you were to park anywhere near water in one of these you run the serious risk of drunken youths tossing it in for a swim. The open rear propeller may look dangerous to some, but it’s better than the big yellow pair of oars I was expecting. This is clearly a company to keep an eye on. Tang Hua Motors.

If you liked this design, you would also be interested in:

Keep up with the latest designs by subscribing to our RSS or Newsletter.

6 Comments »

Comment by ModuleS
2008-04-18 07:40:35

 

ummmm is this for real? It’s great to keep pushing for a amphibious car but this design is targeting the wrong market. Think about it, it’s a cute design which is only going to attract the female market but as far as amphibious cars are concerned, only the male market would fork out the cash.

 
Comment by hairmare
2008-04-18 08:08:08

 

i for one welcome our new amphibious overlords ;)

 
Comment by Shiella
2008-04-19 04:07:26

 

The one with front sets only looks better design than the one with back seat.

 
Comment by Tablespoon
2008-04-22 01:09:36

 

It seems that the designers came up with the two-seater first and the execs wanted more… Unfortunate decision, the two-seater is quite nice. Why not ditch the amphibious idea and go for the compact car/inner city market?

I applaud any company that expands the horizons a bit.

 
2008-04-18 07:39:27 Pingback
The Detroit Fish :
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.