Dumbbells Make Getting Swoll A Lot Easier
If it weren’t for lack of motivation and the trouble managing a set of dumbbells, I’d be one buff guy, for serious ya’ll! The Revolution Dumbbell enables you to digitally adjust weight by rotating a dial and pushing a couple buttons. Inside are tiny balls that spin. The faster they spin, the more weight is generated. No mention on how much energy would be required to power such a novel idea but that’s just all in the logistics. I need this now.
Designer: Sang-Hoon Lee



If you liked this design, you would also be interested in:
- Universal Scale Makes Weighing Easier
- Designer Zimbabwe Granite Dumbbells by Big Game Studio
- Milan 2007: Plus Is More by Big-game
- Need a Little Charge? Stick Up a Febot!
- My Weight’s a Secret
Keep up with the latest designs by subscribing to our RSS or Newsletter.








33 Comments »
zippyflounder says
Damn it all do your research its INERTIA, not weight…the weight remains the same unless you acclerate the object…What in effect this piece of fluff is a gryo, and a tiny whimpy one at that….here read a bit before you render.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia
Adam says
Is it worth mentioning that the law of conservation of mass makes this impossible? No? Ok. The only way to “generate” weight would be to increase the pull of gravity on a mass. I don’t think these dumbbells do that. Spinning up a mass will certainly generate rotational inertia, but that won’t increase resistance for weightlifting movements.
I guess this is why engineers shouldn’t read design blogs.
zippyflounder says
no adam thats why designers should do a bit of research before they fire up the rino/photoshop. Its also a reason why a real designer pays attention to science and engineering….
mariess says
theirs a gyro thing called a powerball that has the same concept they are quite addictive.
Berkana says
Wrong concept; the powerball resists being turned; it does not resist being lifted. Gyroscopic reisistance only resists changing directions, but it does not make the thing any heavier.
If this pair of dumb-bells is intended to build your forearm’s twisting strength, it might work, but you can’t really expect it to build your biceps or do any conventional exercises with it.
W. Brinkman says
Is this supposed to be some sort of gyroscopic exercise tool? As the previous comment correctly states: you cant generate mass with this, but can generate momentum.
As the owner of a powerball myself, im not sure how this would be a joy to use when there are two at the end of the handle, while you try to keep it under control.
It will also be an engineering marvel to keep both of the gyroscopes within phase of each other.
IDME says
As an engineer and designer, I can say that while cool looking, this is totally physically impossible.
ModuleS says
I been following YD for the last 2-3 years ever since it started and it’s interesting how the site has grown and attracts a large demographic of people. We got engineers visiting a design site and giving their expertise! This is very useful information for me.
you says
it doesn’t make any sense. If you’ve already known that something is impossible and even against existing physical rules, is your dessign still a design? I think it is just bullshit.
zippyflounder says
I dont think the “designer” knew, was asleep in science class and too lasy to do the research.
prodmod says
Hmm. I agree that you arent able to “add weight” this way. But I like the idea of a digitally controlled and motorized “powerball-like” device. As previous commenters mentioned the powerball creates a gyroscopic effect which offers resistance to motion. I think it helps with tennis elbow? also it is pretty cool to feel. And it is infact an exercise tool. If you move your arm or wave your hand you do feel resistance and are in fact excercizing, but you have to be rotating it, not just using it as a dumbbell.
see a quote from powerball.com
“NSD Powerball generates between 1 - 40lbs of resistance depending on rotor speed ..”
So I suggest the designer drops the dumbell weight lifting idea, keep the shape and style, and keep the motor. but I dont think you need little ball bearings. A spinning weight does just fine. If you had two seperately controlled spinning masses at each end and they were not matching speed you would have a weird effect which may or may not be comfortable. But you can always just lock the two spinning weights so that they are spun by one motor at the same speed.
and to prove the point that it does “add weight”, if you hold a power drill in your hand, does it feel heavier when to press the trigger? no, you just feel a quick jerk due to the inertia of the spinning mass.
As usual I like fantastical designs, even if they dont work in the real world. I would still like to see this turned into some product even if its just a digitally contolled cylindrical powerball.
Greg says
Wow can you believe this “Engineers” are using the word IMP*SSIBLE and C*N’T, a real Engineer should not use those words…they are limiting. I agree with prodmod “As usual I like fantastical designs, even if they dont work in the real world. I would still like to see this turned into some product even if its just a digitally contolled cylindrical powerball.”
Free your mind.
ps..respect to my Engineer brothers
zippyflounder says
Greg: Here is a thought, get in touch with the designer spend money on a working prototype (max out your credit cards doing so) and get back to us..ok. Engineers should and must call BS when we see something that flat out wrong. You should thank us for doing that (as a ID and a engineer) as we likely have saved your job, your life even.
jin_woo_han says
하나가져와 운동좀하자
T says
@Greg
Don’t be a moron
Also, don’t tell me that I CAN’T telepathically control objects. I don’t want you to say that’s it’s IMPOSSIBLE. Because, obviously, if I dream hard enough, I will eventually be able to move things with my mind.
F-you says
Greg, I think you might be confusing engineering with magic. Completely understandable since you are obviously a halfwit.
RS08 says
Wow… this is stupid
Berkana says
Emphasize the “Dumb” in dumbbells in this case.
Berkana says
I studied industrial design, and I also studied engineering. Why do designers think they can whip any product into a “design” by making it 1) digital, and 2) unnecessarily complicated? (in this case, by invoking non-existent or wrong science?) That is not the point of design. Any fool can say “poof! It’s digital!”. Any infomercial will show you how to make something unnecessarily complicated.
I’m shocked this designer’s instructors didn’t call him out on this. Shame on them.
Roaring.flames says
even if it does increase the mass (which i don’t see how that can happen), it isn’t practical.. this is just a simple design which is only useful for a very limited work out..
the design does look cool, but that is all there is to it…
Will says
I’M AN ENGINEER AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!!
Ironically I did ask many people about this concept, and they (all non-engineers, just product designers) said it made sense!
What you would get with this is similar to a POWERBALL. Like a Powerball, it won’t increase in weight but create a rotational force.
This design is cool, but impossible. You guys have to remember that product designers may be artistic, but have no real intelligence.
abcT says
I think it may be worth pointing out that a subset of excercises for which dumbells are used would involve rotation of the dumbell about an axis that is not aligned with the dumbell axis. An example of such an excercise would be lifting of the dumbell from arm relaxed (axis horizontal) through 90 deg arm bend (axis vertical) to bicep fully contracted (axis horizontal). This motion would generate a resistive couple, increasing the work required (although the majority of the additional muscular requirement may be unlikely to come from the biceps/triceps.
I am also an engineer and do agree with above comments insofar as the product is unlikely to function as the designer intended and that it would be helpful if the designer had a more thorough grounding in engineering/mechanics in order to avoid wasted effort. I do, however, disagree with the way this was highlighted in this thread. As engineers we should both understand that product designers may posess talents that are outside of our own expertise and that an agressive approach is unlikely to convince a designer to improve their understanding of engineering principles
Trackbacks