<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/</link> <description>Modern Industrial Design News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator> <item><title>By: Devin</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-72700</link> <dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-72700</guid> <description>Stabilization in the body saves you a lot of money instead of paying to have each lens stabilized the body does it instead making each lens able to perform this way. For example the canon 75-300 is ~279.99 without IS with IS it is 799.99. I would not mark down the Olympus line since their stabilization is just as effective. For more info visit this site. I shot with the 420 and the E3 I am quite fond of them and would recommend this camera to anyone looking for a small DSLR which does not way much and still preforms great.
http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/dslr_16742.htm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stabilization in the body saves you a lot of money instead of paying to have each lens stabilized the body does it instead making each lens able to perform this way. For example the canon 75-300 is ~279.99 without IS with IS it is 799.99. I would not mark down the Olympus line since their stabilization is just as effective. For more info visit this site. I shot with the 420 and the E3 I am quite fond of them and would recommend this camera to anyone looking for a small DSLR which does not way much and still preforms great.</p><p><a
href="http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/dslr_16742.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/dslr_16742.htm</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hakon</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-71928</link> <dc:creator>Hakon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-71928</guid> <description>Au contraire, Markus. The G-1 is actually compatible with nearly every single lens out there since its short flange distance makes it possible to add adapters for basically every lens ever made.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Au contraire, Markus. The G-1 is actually compatible with nearly every single lens out there since its short flange distance makes it possible to add adapters for basically every lens ever made.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: shagster</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-64475</link> <dc:creator>shagster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:20:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-64475</guid> <description>the G1 isn&#039;t not an SLR! it doesn&#039;t have a miror.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the G1 isn&#8217;t not an SLR! it doesn&#8217;t have a miror.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robin</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-63733</link> <dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:28:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-63733</guid> <description>Is relay nice post........</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is relay nice post&#8230;&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60852</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:38:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60852</guid> <description>Markus, I will not argue with you on that point.  I&#039;m not even sure we can call the G1 an SLR because there is no mirror to reflex.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markus, I will not argue with you on that point.  I&#8217;m not even sure we can call the G1 an SLR because there is no mirror to reflex.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Markus</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60389</link> <dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:41:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60389</guid> <description>The Pannie G1 may be a tad smaller but at a huge cost. It&#039;s incompatible with nearly every single lens out there and any pro photographer knows it&#039;s all about the lens.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pannie G1 may be a tad smaller but at a huge cost. It&#8217;s incompatible with nearly every single lens out there and any pro photographer knows it&#8217;s all about the lens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marek</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60359</link> <dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60359</guid> <description>Interesting article, definitely. Especially as the E-420 is already around for quite some time, and sometimes there are really good deals including the standard 14-42mm lens.
Unfortunately, searching the web for other kits or even for the 25mm or 35mm lens themselves was frustrating - they are way more expensive than mentioned in the article!
Is there a special source where the lenses can be found for under 200 bucks?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, definitely. Especially as the E-420 is already around for quite some time, and sometimes there are really good deals including the standard 14-42mm lens.</p><p>Unfortunately, searching the web for other kits or even for the 25mm or 35mm lens themselves was frustrating &#8211; they are way more expensive than mentioned in the article!</p><p>Is there a special source where the lenses can be found for under 200 bucks?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60326</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60326</guid> <description>Your post starts off by saying, &quot;It’s the world’s smallest SLR or at least the smallest with interchangeable lenses.&quot;  You know the internet; you will be corrected, even if you were right in the first place.  I just wanted to state that the Panasonic G1 is smaller in every dimension and weighs less as well.  Of course, the E-420 is a four thirds camera and the G1 is a micro four thirds camera.  I see that dpreview posted a review of the G1 today.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post starts off by saying, &#8220;It’s the world’s smallest SLR or at least the smallest with interchangeable lenses.&#8221;  You know the internet; you will be corrected, even if you were right in the first place.  I just wanted to state that the Panasonic G1 is smaller in every dimension and weighs less as well.  Of course, the E-420 is a four thirds camera and the G1 is a micro four thirds camera.  I see that dpreview posted a review of the G1 today.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review &#124; Techie-Ideas.com</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60313</link> <dc:creator>Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review &#124; Techie-Ideas.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60313</guid> <description>[...] the original here: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review      (No Ratings Yet) &#160;Loading [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original here: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review      (No Ratings Yet) &nbsp;Loading [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review &#124; Techie-Ideas.com</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/19/compact-slr-olympus-e-420-review/comment-page-1/#comment-60314</link> <dc:creator>Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review &#124; Techie-Ideas.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/?p=5723#comment-60314</guid> <description>[...] post: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review      (No Ratings Yet) &#160;Loading [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Compact SLR? Olympus E-420 Review      (No Ratings Yet) &nbsp;Loading [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
