Comments on: Want to step outside for a smoke?

By: Reason

Reason — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:03:46 +0000

What about non-smokers going to establishments that cater to non-smokers? Why must we legislate when a private business owner can and cannnot allow leagal activities in his establishment? What has happened to our “Free Country”?

By: watchface

watchface — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:16:11 +0000

I would love to see you say that to the face of some poor soul that has cancer due to smoking. maybe look into the eyes of their kids while you do it. Then sit back and bask in your dispassionate state and think, indeed a twat I have become.

By: Crystal

Crystal — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:29:05 +0000

You bought a bill of goods dear. Do your own research, dont rely on the reports you hear, the ones that spell doom. It is filled with lies and almost less research than you have done yourself.
I believe smoking should be banned inside of public buildings. Not in my own home or car. Not outside. And some bars should be allowed to designate themselves as smoking. Let the owners decide how they conduct business. Perhaps bars that get 20% or less from the sale of food should be allowed smoking because they obviously arent a family reasturant. Let people enjoy their guilty pleasures. Pipe smokers have been shown to live longer than non smokers. Put THAT in your pipe and…oh…right.
Carl, you are a jerk. No one deserves cancer. Be careful what you curse someone with. It could come back and bite you in the ass.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:29:37 +0000

You are a retard. It’s because people didn’t like the smell. So what do you do then, make up medical bullshit. Do your own research, and I’m not talking wikipedia.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:27:10 +0000

Yeah, jeez, outside smoke is ridiculous. Just like those stupid car drivers, who put their dangerous exhaust in the air. They don’t respect us non-drivers, and they drive EVERYWHERE, I can’t avoid them. Don’t even get me started on household cleaning supplies and grill fumes, which are far more dangerous than cigarette smoke.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:24:16 +0000

Oh so it was more government regulation on deciding what goes into our own bodies, not preventing that second hand smoke bullshit. Sounds cool.

By: carl

carl — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:43:39 +0000

Perhaps this unit could be installed in the cancer ward after the smokers shortened life is about to end, they can look up and smile at this supplementary product that encouraged their slow suicide with a sense of irony.

Smokers deserve cancer..

By: Slawek

Slawek — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:35:04 +0000

Sorry, but this is stupid comment: “don’t put yourself in places where there are people who smoke”. Many times it’s impossible. Building exits, bus/train/metro stops, restrooms (omg!), streets! All public places, but smokers don’t respect the non-smokers. When I’m waking with my two kids in park, there’s plenty of smoking people around. Thinking your way to avoid cigarette smoke i must: drive my own car everywere, exits office building through a ladder (sic!), stay with my kids at home in my free day. I will not mentioned here pubs etc. by purpose. Think what you are writing.

By: Ronen

Ronen — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:21:10 +0000

I dont smoke around those whom are allergic to it but if im smokeing and someone is walking over to where im at with no reason then i am a bit reluctant to stop.

By: Behelmtes Rauchen | Tekno Hane

Behelmtes Rauchen | Tekno Hane — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:56:19 +0000

[...] Untergang herbeizureden angesichts der neuen Rauchverbote, hat Designer Florian Brillet sich Smoker Bell einfallen lassen, eine Vorrichtung, die es Nikotinsüchtigen erlaubt, wohlbehütet für einige [...]