<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wi-Fire Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/</link> <description>Modern Industrial Design News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator> <item><title>By: eceplayg</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-186484</link> <dc:creator>eceplayg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-186484</guid> <description>Check out this review, its recently done (couple months ago) and its with the new redesigned Wi-Fire which looks MUCH better! &lt;a href=&quot;http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-fire-review/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this review, its recently done (couple months ago) and its with the new redesigned Wi-Fire which looks MUCH better! <a
href="http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-fire-review/" target="_blank"></a><a
href="http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f.." rel="nofollow">http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f..</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eceplayg</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-273927</link> <dc:creator>eceplayg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-273927</guid> <description>Check out this review, its recently done (couple months ago) and its with the new redesigned Wi-Fire which looks MUCH better! &lt;a href=&quot;http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-fire-review/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this review, its recently done (couple months ago) and its with the new redesigned Wi-Fire which looks MUCH better! <a
href="http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-fire-review/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f.." rel="nofollow">http://eceplayground.com/2010/07/28/featured-wi-f..</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LS</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-80677</link> <dc:creator>LS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-80677</guid> <description>Thought I was the only one with lousy experience with this adapter
I see I&#039;m not alone! A couple years ago I bought a Wi-Fire that did manage to improve the signal a little bit from my wireless router 300 feet away.  I wish I had a dollar for every reinstall of the buggy WiFire drivers I had to do to get the thing even to work somewhat reliably. Technical support was very poor, delaying an entire month with slow email runaround excuses before finally and begrudgingly replacing the dead-on-arrival unit I received. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I was the only one with lousy experience with this adapter<br
/> I see I&#8217;m not alone! A couple years ago I bought a Wi-Fire that did manage to improve the signal a little bit from my wireless router 300 feet away.  I wish I had a dollar for every reinstall of the buggy WiFire drivers I had to do to get the thing even to work somewhat reliably. Technical support was very poor, delaying an entire month with slow email runaround excuses before finally and begrudgingly replacing the dead-on-arrival unit I received.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ejg</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-73333</link> <dc:creator>ejg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-73333</guid> <description>It makes no sense to criticize this antenna by saying &quot;my internal shows 100% but the wi-fire shows 80-90%&quot;. Note that Wi-fire was made to better your connection distance by supplying a very sensitive antenna combined with a very small reflector focused in a specific direction. The oversensitive antenna over saturates close in which is why you see erroneous measurements for your closeby/home network. I question the credibility of some of the negative tests reported here.
I myself am able to connect to a neighbors network and speedtest shows 7Mbps down, 3Mbps up. The network is about 300 yards away. Signal strength is 50% whereas I could not see the signal with my laptop. Great antenna except the clip-on really is a joke. Better to set it on a flat surface.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes no sense to criticize this antenna by saying &#8220;my internal shows 100% but the wi-fire shows 80-90%&#8221;. Note that Wi-fire was made to better your connection distance by supplying a very sensitive antenna combined with a very small reflector focused in a specific direction. The oversensitive antenna over saturates close in which is why you see erroneous measurements for your closeby/home network. I question the credibility of some of the negative tests reported here.</p><p>I myself am able to connect to a neighbors network and speedtest shows 7Mbps down, 3Mbps up. The network is about 300 yards away. Signal strength is 50% whereas I could not see the signal with my laptop. Great antenna except the clip-on really is a joke. Better to set it on a flat surface.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snowbird</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-62689</link> <dc:creator>snowbird</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:18:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-62689</guid> <description>Wi-fire is garbage. I bought one - it shows the networks fine - but if they are encrypted good luck at logging in if your getting low-medium signal. Even at 20 percent, Wi-fire refused to log in and got stuck on (acquiring,,,,,,) forever.  Garbage</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wi-fire is garbage. I bought one &#8211; it shows the networks fine &#8211; but if they are encrypted good luck at logging in if your getting low-medium signal. Even at 20 percent, Wi-fire refused to log in and got stuck on (acquiring,,,,,,) forever.  Garbage</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-58467</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-58467</guid> <description>I just recently acquired a Wi-Fire unit.
A few notes on this one. For starts, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth $80. The third party wireless software bundled with this unit is a choppy hack at best; it consistently crashes. The hardware mount is crap, and the unit really isn&#039;t that powerful. I honestly doubt it&#039;s using 500mw.
I was able to get the item to connect on both my Macbook, my Macbook pro, and my 1.67ghz pb G4, but not without frequent restarts/reinstalls/forced quits. My longest stretch of connectivity was roughly 5 hours. On my Macbook and G4 pb, I did notice an increase in signal strength. However, on my Macbook Pro, signal was slightly weaker than what the stock Airport card achieves
I was unable to see a reduction in either latency to my game servers, or an increase in total bandwidth using the Wi-Fire. In fact, most of my ping times increased by 20-30ms. I suspect this is due to the crappy drivers. I would recommend a Hawking product instead. DO NOT BUY</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently acquired a Wi-Fire unit.</p><p>A few notes on this one. For starts, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth $80. The third party wireless software bundled with this unit is a choppy hack at best; it consistently crashes. The hardware mount is crap, and the unit really isn&#8217;t that powerful. I honestly doubt it&#8217;s using 500mw.</p><p>I was able to get the item to connect on both my Macbook, my Macbook pro, and my 1.67ghz pb G4, but not without frequent restarts/reinstalls/forced quits. My longest stretch of connectivity was roughly 5 hours. On my Macbook and G4 pb, I did notice an increase in signal strength. However, on my Macbook Pro, signal was slightly weaker than what the stock Airport card achieves</p><p>I was unable to see a reduction in either latency to my game servers, or an increase in total bandwidth using the Wi-Fire. In fact, most of my ping times increased by 20-30ms. I suspect this is due to the crappy drivers. I would recommend a Hawking product instead. DO NOT BUY</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Red</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-48279</link> <dc:creator>Red</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-48279</guid> <description>This piece of crap is worst than my internal antenna.
Even when I&#039;m sitting right next to the router, and have it pointed right at the router I only get 80-90% signal VS my internal 100% signal.
Then there&#039;s the speed issues--
Download speeds with Wi-fire were about 20-30 kb.
Internal 300-500 kb.
Yes it can see AP farther away than an internal antenna, BUT the connection goes in and out, or it doesnt even connect to the AP.
Dont waste your time with this shit, its just a cheap usb wifi with a cheap directional antenna.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece of crap is worst than my internal antenna.</p><p>Even when I&#8217;m sitting right next to the router, and have it pointed right at the router I only get 80-90% signal VS my internal 100% signal.</p><p>Then there&#8217;s the speed issues&#8211;<br
/> Download speeds with Wi-fire were about 20-30 kb.<br
/> Internal 300-500 kb.</p><p>Yes it can see AP farther away than an internal antenna, BUT the connection goes in and out, or it doesnt even connect to the AP.</p><p>Dont waste your time with this shit, its just a cheap usb wifi with a cheap directional antenna.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darren</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-46812</link> <dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:22:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-46812</guid> <description>The software for Leopard is not really functional it often causes kernal_task to eat up all my cpu cycles and nothing but restart will fix the issue.  Great idea, but useless without functional software.  Still no sign for their improved Version 2.0 software either even with a Summer 2008 release date.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software for Leopard is not really functional it often causes kernal_task to eat up all my cpu cycles and nothing but restart will fix the issue.  Great idea, but useless without functional software.  Still no sign for their improved Version 2.0 software either even with a Summer 2008 release date.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Makay6</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-33080</link> <dc:creator>Makay6</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-33080</guid> <description>I love this gadget.  It works well with my computer both at home and when I am traveling.  I take it everywhere I take my laptop and I am always pleased with the results.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this gadget.  It works well with my computer both at home and when I am traveling.  I take it everywhere I take my laptop and I am always pleased with the results.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kzai</title><link>http://www.yankodesign.com/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25888</link> <dc:creator>kzai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:56:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2007/12/19/wi-fire-review/#comment-25888</guid> <description>very good ! i like it</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good ! i like it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
